The SN 60D3 group had low contrast sensitivity performed under mesopic conditions (KW = 10.79 p=0,0045 in 6cpd spatial frequency compared to the SN 60AT group (p=0.011 and to the SN 60 WF group (p=0.007 with statistical significant differences. The SN 60D3 group compared to SN 60AT group (p=0.016 had low contrast sensitivity (log units with statistical difference in 6.0 cpd (KW = 7.84 p=0.0199, but no statistical difference between SN 60 WF and SN 60AT group (p=0.91 and SN 60 WF and SN 60D3 group (p=0.051. No significant differences were found between groups in far-distance VA measured using ETDRS at 100% and 9% contrast. The SN 60AT group (KW = 16.20 p=0.0003 showed with high spherical aberration values compared to the SN 60 WF (p=0.00046 and SN 60D3 (p=0.0014 group. Results: Statistically significant differences were detected more total aberration in SN 60AT group (KW = 9.42 p=0.009 when compared to SN 60D3 group (p=0.016 and SN 60 WF group (p=0.0047.
All patients was tested with the OPD-scan aberrometer, ETDRS chart at 100% and 9% contrasts and contrast sensitivity. They were closely paired in age, sex, pre-operative wavefront analysis and contrast sensitivity.
Methods: Thirty-two eyes received the multifocal IOL, 32 eyes received the spheric monofocal IOL and 32 eyes received the aspheric monofocal IOL. Comparison between OPD-scan results and contrast sensitivity of three intraocular lenses: spheric AcrySof SN 60AT, aspheric AcrySof SN 60 WF and multifocal AcrySof Restor lens Estudo comparativo da análise de frente de onda e sensibilidade ao contraste entre as lentes intra-oculares multifocal AcrySof Restor SN 60D3, monofocal AcrySof SN 60 WF asférica e a monofocal SN 60AT esféricaĭirectory of Open Access Journals (Sweden)įull Text Available Purpose: Compare the OPD-scan results and the contrast sensitivity in patients who had implantation of the AcrySof SN 60D3 multifocal IOL, the AcrySof SA 60AT spheric monofocal IOL and the AcrySof SN 60AT aspheric monofocal IOL.